Trump supporters hate America

[merh]

[merh]

King Donald

[merh]

[merh]

[merh]

May 18, 2022 7:47:50 GMT abbey1227 said:

May 18, 2022 7:37:38 GMT merh said:

No.

For some crazy reason he went after black people after ranting about Jews.
Blacks are like 13% of the population. Have been forever. The kid obviously was using it as an excuse for his hatred of blacks, that they were taking White Americans' place when it's the Hispanics & Asians doing that. 
Not to mention it doesn't mean any one group will necessarily be larger than Whites, but that all the non-white groups together will be over 50% of the population.

We've seen how well the various groups get along, haven't we?

But he fed into the victimhood that I keep complaining about. "Poor me!"
Victims, aren't we all?
Get over it.

so it appears he's just a plain old whackadoodle?

Blacks are not taking white Americans' place.........you're right........ Hispanics and Asians are doing that.   

and there it is......... NONE of these groups get along all that well.......so it's not just a black or white thing by any stretch of the imagination.

You must not be popular with the feminists, the gays, the transgenders, Illegals etc etc etc........they play the 'Poor me!' game, too

www.yahoo.com/news/tucker-carlson-not-sure-great-023154102.html

HuffPost
Tucker Carlson ‘Not Sure’ About Great Replacement Theory After Pushing It 400 Times
Nick Visser
Tue, May 17, 2022, 7:31 PM
Fox News host Tucker Carlson tried to distance himself Tuesday from the white supremacist “great replacement” theory he’s peddled on his prime time show for years, before launching into a long rant about Democratic plots to encourage immigration to win elections, a key tenet of the conspiracy idea.

Carlson opened his program Tuesday denouncing the 18-year-old suspect accused of killing 10 people at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York last week. The man, Payton Gendron, is accused of targeting the store, which sits in a predominantly Black neighborhood, after posting a 180-page screed online featuring racist, white supremacist tropes. The document references extreme versions of what’s known as “replacement theory,” which baselessly claims powerful Democrats and others are plotting to replace white Americans with people of color through immigration policies.

HuffPost
Tucker Carlson ‘Not Sure’ About Great Replacement Theory After Pushing It 400 Times
Nick Visser
Tue, May 17, 2022, 7:31 PM
Fox News host Tucker Carlson tried to distance himself Tuesday from the white supremacist “great replacement” theory he’s peddled on his prime time show for years, before launching into a long rant about Democratic plots to encourage immigration to win elections, a key tenet of the conspiracy idea.

Carlson opened his program Tuesday denouncing the 18-year-old suspect accused of killing 10 people at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York last week. The man, Payton Gendron, is accused of targeting the store, which sits in a predominantly Black neighborhood, after posting a 180-page screed online featuring racist, white supremacist tropes. The document references extreme versions of what’s known as “replacement theory,” which baselessly claims powerful Democrats and others are plotting to replace white Americans with people of color through immigration policies.

[abbey1227]

May 18, 2022 22:24:59 GMT merh said:

HuffPost
Tucker Carlson ‘Not Sure’ About Great Replacement Theory After Pushing It 400 Times
Nick Visser
Tue, May 17, 2022, 7:31 PM
Fox News host Tucker Carlson tried to distance himself Tuesday from the white supremacist “great replacement” theory he’s peddled on his prime time show for years, before launching into a long rant about Democratic plots to encourage immigration to win elections, a key tenet of the conspiracy idea.

Carlson opened his program Tuesday denouncing the 18-year-old suspect accused of killing 10 people at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York last week. The man, Payton Gendron, is accused of targeting the store, which sits in a predominantly Black neighborhood, after posting a 180-page screed online featuring racist, white supremacist tropes. The document references extreme versions of what’s known as “replacement theory,” which baselessly claims powerful Democrats and others are plotting to replace white Americans with people of color through immigration policies.

You can disagree with the conclusions........but how can you say it's baseless?   

[abbey1227]

May 18, 2022 17:52:30 GMT merh said:

King Donald

It's funny his suit is orange. 

#1 Best Seller in Children's Action & Adventure Books

[abbey1227]

May 18, 2022 19:42:27 GMT merh said:

A shining example of what happens when you allow foreigners in and they do not assimilate.

[merh]

[merh]

And his lawyer John Eastman is trying to shield them from the January 6th committee.

TEXT:

President Donald Trump was so deeply involved in the desperate, last-ditch effort to overturn the 2020 election results that he hand-wrote strategy notes, hired at least ten lawyers to work on just one court case, and spoke regularly with one of his lead lawyers both directly and through six conduits.

John Eastman, the law professor tapped by Trump to craft a legal strategy to keep him in power, detailed those extensive communications in a new court filing late Thursday as he argued it should all be shielded from the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection because of attorney-client privilege or attorney work product protections.

Eastman has been battling the House Committee in California federal court in an effort to prevent it accessing tens of thousands of pages of emails from his email address with Chapman University, where he worked as a law professor until shortly after the Capitol riot.

But U.S. District Court Judge David Carter has not been impressed with Eastman’s arguments thus far. In one blistering ruling from March in which he ordered Eastman to hand over 101 emails, Carter found that Eastman and Trump “more likely than not” committed a felony by trying to obstruct Congress and overturn the results of the 2020 election.

Thursday’s filing provided a new insight into the extraordinarily extensive effort to challenge the election result, one that began well before Americans even went to the polls and involved reams of emails flying back-and-forth between Trump, his attorneys, and other conduits.

Eastman’s filing says he was hired by Trump two months before the Nov. 3 election when he was invited by Trump attorney Cleta Mitchell “to join an Election Integrity Working Group to begin preparing for anticipated litigation.” Things “kicked into high gear” when he was asked to meet with a team in Philadelphia four days after the election to help prepare an election challenge, the filing says.

Of the 601 documents he’s trying to shield from the committee, Eastman argues that 113 contain privileged Trump-related communications, including communications between Eastman and Trump himself, or “six conduits” for Trump, three of whom had formal campaign roles.

Two of those documents are email attachments containing hand-written notes from Trump “about information that he thought might be useful for the anticipated litigation,” the filing says.

Eastman argues another 50 documents are covered by attorney-client privileges related to clients other than Trump, including “9 different clients or potential clients who were seeking Dr. Eastman’s legal advice regarding the constitutional authority of state legislatures to deal with election illegality and fraud.” They include state legislators, a party committeewomen, and a citizen coordinating information sessions for state legislators, the filing says, without including the names of those involved.

Eastman also argues that 557 of the 601 documents are covered under attorney work product protections, in part because they relate to work on a half-dozen court cases Team Trump filed—all of which were unsuccessful.

One of those cases, Texas v. Pennsylvania et al., in which Texas challenged several others states’ election protocols in the Supreme Court, Eastman says there were ten attorneys included on some emails who were “working on behalf of then-President Trump or his campaign committee directly” and three others assisting Eastman separately. (In a footnote, Eastman notes that at least one of those ten attorneys has since claimed he was not involved as co-counsel “after someone provided him with information from Dr. Eastman’s privilege log, which this Court had ordered to be filed under seal.”)

At least 46 documents detail communications between Eastman and “a group of statisticians working with him conducting statistical analyses of the Georgia Senate Runoff election in anticipation of election litigation that did not materialize,” the filing adds.

Eastman also argues that the work product protection should extend to a dozen emails he exchanged with an unnamed attorney, radio host and Claremont Institute fellow that Politico identified as Fox News host Mark Levin.

D.C. Attorney General Lets the Trump Swamp Win Again

The filing shows Eastman is still deeply convinced the election was rife with fraud, and it lays out several claims that have mostly been debunked or thrown out of court. Among the evidence his lawyers present to back up that assertion is the “new documentary film by Dinesh D’Souza”—which, as The Daily Beast has reported, is so lax with the truth that even Fox News and Newsmax wouldn’t touch it.

“One might even say that the assertion of a ‘big lie’ is itself the actual big lie,” the filing argues.

But in the same breath, Eastman’s lawyers argue that Carter’s prior suggestion of illegal obstruction was wrong because Eastman and Trump were simply doing their constitutionally-protected due diligence, believing at the time it was “a legitimate attempt to prevent a stolen election.”

“Perhaps Dr. Eastman was wrong about that,” the filing says.

www.thedailybeast.com/trump-hand-wrote-strategy-notes-for-overturning-the-election-lawyer-john-eastman-reveals-in-court-filing?source=articles&via=rss

[merh]

[merh]

[abbey1227]

May 22, 2022 3:41:44 GMT merh said:

I'm just waiting for the same 'walk away' approach to Govt

[merh]

[merh]

[abbey1227]

May 22, 2022 14:44:40 GMT merh said:

Hate the child? How about just not wanting to be responsible for others' children? or abortions?

Workers are the easier piece to replace.

Who spit on returning soldiers again?

a good portion of Americans hold very anti-American ideals.

Separation of church and state........and this is not and should never be a straight full on democracy.

[fetzerzinfandel]

May 22, 2022 14:45:54 GMT merh said:

This is spot on. They repeated the tired "he's not a perfect man" bullshit after it came out that he barebacked the porn star while his third wife was home nursing a baby, but then claim that if you support a woman's right to chose you can't be a Christian.

[fetzerzinfandel]

May 22, 2022 14:58:57 GMT abbey1227 said:

May 22, 2022 14:44:40 GMT merh said:

Hate the child? How about just not wanting to be responsible for others' children? or abortions?

Workers are the easier piece to replace.

Who spit on returning soldiers again?

a good portion of Americans hold very anti-American ideals.

Separation of church and state........and this is not and should never be a straight full on democracy.

Look, pal, if it was just about not being responsible for other people's abortions it would be simple. But of course it's NOT about that, and you know it.
But yes, you're right MAGA is unAmerican.

[abbey1227]

May 22, 2022 15:07:33 GMT fetzerzinfandel said:

Look, pal, if it was just about not being responsible for other people's abortions it would be simple. But of course it's NOT about that, and you know it.
But yes, you're right MAGA is unAmerican.

It's never about just one thing..............but it usually is all about $Money........specifically tax payers' money.

I know that some people believe life begins at conception, so of course for them it's not about just the one thing.

Yep......that's a pretty impressive argument........stating that America First is unAmerican.  Spectacular spin-job  

[merh]

May 22, 2022 15:13:44 GMT abbey1227 said:

May 22, 2022 15:07:33 GMT fetzerzinfandel said:

Look, pal, if it was just about not being responsible for other people's abortions it would be simple. But of course it's NOT about that, and you know it.
But yes, you're right MAGA is unAmerican.

It's never about just one thing..............but it usually is all about $Money........specifically tax payers' money.

I know that some people believe life begins at conception, so of course for them it's not about just the one thing.

Yep......that's a pretty impressive argument........stating that America First is unAmerican.  Spectacular spin-job  

Taxpayers don't pay for abortions.

If they did, isnt $750 better than $200,000?

An abortion can cost up to $750, but it’s often less. The cost of abortion can vary depending on the state or health center where you get care and whether you can use health insurance (private or government insurance). Your nearest Planned Parenthood health center can give you more information about the cost of the abortion and funds that might be available to help you pay for your abortion

www.plannedparenthood.org/how-much-does-an-abortion-cost

According to a study conducted by The United States Department of Agriculture, the average cost of raising a child from birth through the age of 17 will cost $233,610. However, this number is only an average and is highly likely to differ for every household.

nomedicalexamquotes.com/cost-of-raising-a-child-0-to-18/

Even if welfare only paid $150/mo/kid, that's $1800/yr or $32,400 for 18 yrs. But there's also food stamps, so double that at least.

You are being very penny-wise/pound foolish.