|
Post by abbey1227 on Nov 30, 2022 7:38:44 GMT
The Daily Beast Couple Ignored Pregnant Woman’s Pleas for Help as She Was Beaten to Death, Police SayAllison Quinn Tue, November 29, 2022 at 5:43 AM Greenville County Sheriff’s Office The savage beating death of a 22-year-old pregnant woman shocked the community of Marietta, South Carolina, earlier this month—and now, authorities say, she might have been saved if one couple had not stood idly by and ignored her tortured pleas for help. Michael Burnett, 43, and Melissa Burnett, 49, were identified by the Greenville County Sheriff’s Office on Monday as relatives of the man accused of bludgeoning Clarissa Winchester to death in early November. Tyler Wilkins, identified in local news reports as Winchester’s boyfriend and the father of her baby, has already been arrested and charged with murder and kidnapping for the mother-to-be’s death. He allegedly beat her over the course of two hours, leaving her with fatal injuries to her head and neck, according to a probable cause affidavit cited by WMBF-TV. <div class="inline-image__caption"><p>Tyler Wilkins.</p></div> <div class="inline-image__credit">Greenville County Sheriff’s Office</div> Tyler Wilkins. Greenville County Sheriff’s Office The Burnetts, according to the sheriff’s office, “were in the house at the time of the brutal assault” but “failed to act, call 911, or provide any other assistance,” even as Winchester reportedly screamed for help. The couple was booked over the weekend on charges of misprision of a felony, but they have since been released on $20,000 bonds, the sheriff’s office said. The Burnetts were described as Wilkins’ uncle and aunt in a report by The State, which cited a spokesperson for the sheriff’s office. Public records list Michael Burnett as residing at the address where police say they found “Winchester’s deceased body along with a lifeless fetus.” Winchester was seven months pregnant at the time of the fatal beating. Police have not said if the baby was stillborn or was born during the deadly attack, but Wilkins is also charged with unlawful conduct toward a child for allegedly failing “to seek medical attention for the recently born fetus,” police said. The baby was a boy, and Winchester had already named him Grayson, according to a GoFundMe set up by the family. Investigators are also eyeing Wilkins in the disappearance of Jorden Nebling, a 19-year-old woman last seen in October 2020, the sheriff’s office said earlier this month. Sheriff’s office investigator Blake Wolfe was quoted as telling The State that Nebling was last seen being picked up by an ex-boyfriend. Nebling’s stepmother, Mary Tucker, identified the ex-boyfriend as Wilkins in comments to Fox News. “In my heart, I think he did something to her,” she said. Wilkins has not been charged in connection with Nebling’s disappearance.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Nov 30, 2022 8:16:23 GMT
How is this "both ways," Abs?
Oh wait. Yeah. You were pro-choice until the Trumptards took away women's rights, now you're showing your true colors.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Nov 30, 2022 21:44:59 GMT
How is this "both ways," Abs? Oh wait. Yeah. You were pro-choice until the Trumptards took away women's rights, now you're showing your true colors. Because women have abortions, that means it shouldn't be murder of 2 people when a pregnant woman is killed. He doesn't get it.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Nov 30, 2022 23:18:37 GMT
How is this "both ways," Abs? Oh wait. Yeah. You were pro-choice until the Trumptards took away women's rights, now you're showing your true colors. Because women have abortions, that means it shouldn't be murder of 2 people when a pregnant woman is killed. He doesn't get it. That's what I said
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Dec 1, 2022 2:44:10 GMT
Because women have abortions, that means it shouldn't be murder of 2 people when a pregnant woman is killed. He doesn't get it.
There's nothing to get.
It's just a clump of cells until it passes thru the magical vagina lips.
It shouldn't matter what she wants at that moment, cuz she could change her mind.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Dec 1, 2022 3:43:43 GMT
Because women have abortions, that means it shouldn't be murder of 2 people when a pregnant woman is killed. He doesn't get it.
There's nothing to get.
It's just a clump of cells until it passes thru the magical vagina lips.
It shouldn't matter what she wants at that moment, cuz she could change her mind.
But, up until that moment, she hadn't and therefore the assumption should be that she was going to keep it.
Of course, now, thanks to your fucktarded party of misogynists, she doesn't get to make that choice, does she? That means that you guys have decided that it's a person and therefore two murders have been committed.
Your team.
Your logic.
Live with it.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Dec 2, 2022 10:37:51 GMT
Because women have abortions, that means it shouldn't be murder of 2 people when a pregnant woman is killed. He doesn't get it.
There's nothing to get.
It's just a clump of cells until it passes thru the magical vagina lips.
It shouldn't matter what she wants at that moment, cuz she could change her mind.
I have explained it. You may love daisies & have them in your yard. I may not so I will remove any that may sprout in my yard from your yard. It doesn't mean daisies don't exist.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Dec 2, 2022 13:30:24 GMT
There's nothing to get.
It's just a clump of cells until it passes thru the magical vagina lips.
It shouldn't matter what she wants at that moment, cuz she could change her mind.
I have explained it. You may love daisies & have them in your yard. I may not so I will remove any that may sprout in my yard from your yard. It doesn't mean daisies don't exist.
If I use a chemical spray to eliminate daisies, or dandelions or crab grass.........it's still something I'm killing off.
I'm OK with killing the things off........ just admit it. Stop playing it both ways.
I'm being consistent here.........I don't care for most people, so I'm not really all that bothered if they're eliminated in the womb or later in life. Wasn't my family or friends, should I even care?
|
|
|
Post by merh on Dec 2, 2022 19:43:26 GMT
I have explained it. You may love daisies & have them in your yard. I may not so I will remove any that may sprout in my yard from your yard. It doesn't mean daisies don't exist.
If I use a chemical spray to eliminate daisies, or dandelions or crab grass.........it's still something I'm killing off.
I'm OK with killing the things off........ just admit it. Stop playing it both ways.
I'm being consistent here.........I don't care for most people, so I'm not really all that bothered if they're eliminated in the womb or later in life. Wasn't my family or friends, should I even care?
So I hate daisies so I rip all the ones in your yard out & it's OK? A pregnant woman has the choice. If you kill a woman intending to deliver the baby then the intent is a baby at the end of the process so killing her is killing 2 people. Your logic only applies if the woman has decided to have an abortion & you kill her. Then it is only 1 murder. Produce her appointment for having her pregnancy terminated & you're up for 1 life sentence instead of 2.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Dec 3, 2022 0:32:48 GMT
If I use a chemical spray to eliminate daisies, or dandelions or crab grass.........it's still something I'm killing off.
I'm OK with killing the things off........ just admit it. Stop playing it both ways.
I'm being consistent here.........I don't care for most people, so I'm not really all that bothered if they're eliminated in the womb or later in life. Wasn't my family or friends, should I even care?
So I hate daisies so I rip all the ones in your yard out & it's OK? A pregnant woman has the choice. If you kill a woman intending to deliver the baby then the intent is a baby at the end of the process so killing her is killing 2 people. Your logic only applies if the woman has decided to have an abortion & you kill her. Then it is only 1 murder. Produce her appointment for having her pregnancy terminated & you're up for 1 life sentence instead of 2. ^^This^^
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Dec 3, 2022 2:07:34 GMT
If I use a chemical spray to eliminate daisies, or dandelions or crab grass.........it's still something I'm killing off.
I'm OK with killing the things off........ just admit it. Stop playing it both ways.
I'm being consistent here.........I don't care for most people, so I'm not really all that bothered if they're eliminated in the womb or later in life. Wasn't my family or friends, should I even care?
So I hate daisies so I rip all the ones in your yard out & it's OK? A pregnant woman has the choice. If you kill a woman intending to deliver the baby then the intent is a baby at the end of the process so killing her is killing 2 people. Your logic only applies if the woman has decided to have an abortion & you kill her. Then it is only 1 murder. Produce her appointment for having her pregnancy terminated & you're up for 1 life sentence instead of 2.
Keep the idea of ownership.......property in mind. And let's be consistent here.
You used the term 'baby' there, even though God, or nature or the woman changing her mind might alter the term used later. THAT's my issue here. THAT's why I'm saying it's both ways.
My logic is more sound than society and the Govt, imo
Let's say some horrible type guts a pregnant cat or dog.........and starts throwing little potentials against the wall........ that gonna be described as harming a single cat or dog?
|
|
|
Post by merh on Dec 3, 2022 7:28:20 GMT
So I hate daisies so I rip all the ones in your yard out & it's OK? A pregnant woman has the choice. If you kill a woman intending to deliver the baby then the intent is a baby at the end of the process so killing her is killing 2 people. Your logic only applies if the woman has decided to have an abortion & you kill her. Then it is only 1 murder. Produce her appointment for having her pregnancy terminated & you're up for 1 life sentence instead of 2.
Keep the idea of ownership.......property in mind. And let's be consistent here.
You used the term 'baby' there, even though God, or nature or the woman changing her mind might alter the term used later. THAT's my issue here. THAT's why I'm saying it's both ways.
My logic is more sound than society and the Govt, imo
Let's say some horrible type guts a pregnant cat or dog.........and starts throwing little potentials against the wall........ that gonna be described as harming a single cat or dog?
I used the term baby for the woman intending to carry the pregnancy to the end & have a baby. A miscarriage is very often grieved as a loss of life, isn't it? So it's not a both ways thing. It is an entirely different mental outlook. Of course you believe only your opinion applies over the women whose bodies are involved. I have no idea. I do not know the law. It will likely be prosecuted as animal cruelty. My memory of people's court is the owner isn't able to get all that much if he takes it to court. How much the person paid for the animal usually.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Dec 3, 2022 13:34:46 GMT
I used the term baby for the woman intending to carry the pregnancy to the end & have a baby. A miscarriage is very often grieved as a loss of life, isn't it? So it's not a both ways thing. It is an entirely different mental outlook. Of course you believe only your opinion applies over the women whose bodies are involved. I have no idea. I do not know the law. It will likely be prosecuted as animal cruelty. My memory of people's court is the owner isn't able to get all that much if he takes it to court. How much the person paid for the animal usually.
It's gotta be one of the few times 'science' considers the intentions involved, rather than just what it is.
Mental outlook? Are you suggesting what we think changes matter or physics? My opinion doesn't matter. Their business........I'd just like to keep it 100% that way.
Yep, it's crazy how often I've seen them describe as simple property.......and people are lucky to get a thing in court. Well, I could certainly argue by the numbers of people on the planet, we're really not all that valuable.
|
|