|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 14, 2022 15:15:50 GMT
Gavin Newsom @gavinnewsom · Follow Governor candidate, CA Make no mistake--Lindsey Graham’s new national ban on abortion is about controlling women. That’s their agenda.
CA’s fighting back.
Today, we’re launching a NEW website to provide resources for women to get reproductive care -- no matter where they live.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 14, 2022 19:50:02 GMT
Planned Parenthood is California now?
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 15, 2022 2:13:56 GMT
Planned Parenthood is California now?
Keep it very simple, merh
Are those tax dollars being spent? or not?
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 15, 2022 2:30:00 GMT
Planned Parenthood is California now?
Keep it very simple, merh
Are those tax dollars being spent? or not?
My tax dollars. Got a text an hour ago..
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 15, 2022 2:34:56 GMT
Keep it very simple, merh
Are those tax dollars being spent? or not?
My tax dollars. Got a text an hour ago..
Lower your taxes, keep your own tax dollars.......and then you and others can voluntarily donate them to whomever you wish. THAT's how it should work.
Will you offer to form a sort of Co-Op to look into purchasing your own apartment buildings and freezing your own rents? Or are you gonna stick with limiting/managing other people's money and property?
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Sept 15, 2022 3:26:18 GMT
My tax dollars. Got a text an hour ago..
Lower your taxes, keep your own tax dollars.......and then you and others can voluntarily donate them to whomever you wish. THAT's how it should work.
Will you offer to form a sort of Co-Op to look into purchasing your own apartment buildings and freezing your own rents? Or are you gonna stick with limiting/managing other people's money and property?
What does the State of California have to do with Planned Parenthood?
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Sept 15, 2022 3:27:12 GMT
My tax dollars. Got a text an hour ago..
Lower your taxes, keep your own tax dollars.......and then you and others can voluntarily donate them to whomever you wish. THAT's how it should work.
Will you offer to form a sort of Co-Op to look into purchasing your own apartment buildings and freezing your own rents? Or are you gonna stick with limiting/managing other people's money and property?
I think it's hilarious how you think that people who can only afford to rent can somehow buy buildings.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 15, 2022 12:34:21 GMT
Lower your taxes, keep your own tax dollars.......and then you and others can voluntarily donate them to whomever you wish. THAT's how it should work.
Will you offer to form a sort of Co-Op to look into purchasing your own apartment buildings and freezing your own rents? Or are you gonna stick with limiting/managing other people's money and property?
What does the State of California have to do with Planned Parenthood? I think it's hilarious how you think that people who can only afford to rent can somehow buy buildings.
It just said right there that Newsome & Co are going to use CA tax dollars to assist PP
They've recently announced mortgages for minorities with no money down in some areas. (horrible idea, imo) And they've suggested approving mortgages at certain levels for people based on them paying rent.
So I gotta wonder why they just don't come up with a new type of mortgage for groups of Renters that want to be owners? Whether it's a 4, 8, 16 or higher unit building.......what difference should it make provided you can use similar qualification standards as what they're already proposing?
If someone fails to pay after purchase?.......out they go. Back to renting, and that creates a new opening for someone else that wants in on the deal. Make it an extra long mortgage of say 40 years so the payment is even lower.......and it entices the bank into such a deal where they collect more Interest for longer. AFTER it's paid off entirely, all that's left is the property taxes and maintenance fees.
Now go ahead and tell me how silly an idea that is. As opposed to using tax dollars perpetually to give people 'rent control'.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 15, 2022 15:53:29 GMT
What does the State of California have to do with Planned Parenthood? I think it's hilarious how you think that people who can only afford to rent can somehow buy buildings.
It just said right there that Newsome & Co are going to use CA tax dollars to assist PP
They've recently announced mortgages for minorities with no money down in some areas. (horrible idea, imo) And they've suggested approving mortgages at certain levels for people based on them paying rent.
So I gotta wonder why they just don't come up with a new type of mortgage for groups of Renters that want to be owners? Whether it's a 4, 8, 16 or higher unit building.......what difference should it make provided you can use similar qualification standards as what they're already proposing?
If someone fails to pay after purchase?.......out they go. Back to renting, and that creates a new opening for someone else that wants in on the deal. Make it an extra long mortgage of say 40 years so the payment is even lower.......and it entices the bank into such a deal where they collect more Interest for longer. AFTER it's paid off entirely, all that's left is the property taxes and maintenance fees.
Now go ahead and tell me how silly an idea that is. As opposed to using tax dollars perpetually to give people 'rent control'.
abortion.ca.gov/Ooo First up not PP! NOT ALL PP! You stated fetuses all deserve a chance at life rather than being exterminated so for all your claims you are pro-choice, you are not.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Sept 15, 2022 22:45:10 GMT
What does the State of California have to do with Planned Parenthood? I think it's hilarious how you think that people who can only afford to rent can somehow buy buildings. It just said right there that Newsome & Co are going to use CA tax dollars to assist PP
They've recently announced mortgages for minorities with no money down in some areas. (horrible idea, imo) And they've suggested approving mortgages at certain levels for people based on them paying rent. So I gotta wonder why they just don't come up with a new type of mortgage for groups of Renters that want to be owners? Whether it's a 4, 8, 16 or higher unit building.......what difference should it make provided you can use similar qualification standards as what they're already proposing?
If someone fails to pay after purchase?.......out they go. Back to renting, and that creates a new opening for someone else that wants in on the deal. Make it an extra long mortgage of say 40 years so the payment is even lower.......and it entices the bank into such a deal where they collect more Interest for longer. AFTER it's paid off entirely, all that's left is the property taxes and maintenance fees. Now go ahead and tell me how silly an idea that is. As opposed to using tax dollars perpetually to give people 'rent control'.
1. I don't see any mention of PP. Is it in your head? 2, 3, 4:
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 16, 2022 1:40:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 16, 2022 1:49:03 GMT
It just said right there that Newsome & Co are going to use CA tax dollars to assist PP
They've recently announced mortgages for minorities with no money down in some areas. (horrible idea, imo) And they've suggested approving mortgages at certain levels for people based on them paying rent.
So I gotta wonder why they just don't come up with a new type of mortgage for groups of Renters that want to be owners? Whether it's a 4, 8, 16 or higher unit building.......what difference should it make provided you can use similar qualification standards as what they're already proposing?
If someone fails to pay after purchase?.......out they go. Back to renting, and that creates a new opening for someone else that wants in on the deal. Make it an extra long mortgage of say 40 years so the payment is even lower.......and it entices the bank into such a deal where they collect more Interest for longer. AFTER it's paid off entirely, all that's left is the property taxes and maintenance fees.
Now go ahead and tell me how silly an idea that is. As opposed to using tax dollars perpetually to give people 'rent control'.
abortion.ca.gov/Ooo First up not PP! NOT ALL PP!You stated fetuses all deserve a chance at life rather than being exterminated so for all your claims you are pro-choice, you are not.
you guys have claimed (lied) for years that PP does not receive tax dollars for abortion.
I'm not sure why this is not sinking in with you, but I'm perfectly fine with every pregnancy ending in an abortion so long as people pay for it themselves. Too many expectations?
I wouldn't expect to burden anyone with an expensive child when they could opt out early and inexpensively. And once again it makes me chuckle because you won't extend that same right to males.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 16, 2022 2:20:56 GMT
abortion.ca.gov/Ooo First up not PP! NOT ALL PP!You stated fetuses all deserve a chance at life rather than being exterminated so for all your claims you are pro-choice, you are not.
you guys have claimed (lied) for years that PP does not receive tax dollars for abortion.
I'm not sure why this is not sinking in with you, but I'm perfectly fine with every pregnancy ending in an abortion so long as people pay for it themselves. Too many expectations?
I wouldn't expect to burden anyone with an expensive child when they could opt out early and inexpensively. And once again it makes me chuckle because you won't extend that same right to males.
It doesn't get FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS. So my tax dollars might cover someone's abortion, but you need to see if your state pays for abortions. Uncle Sam doesn't pay.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 16, 2022 2:24:34 GMT
It doesn't get FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS. So my tax dollars might cover someone's abortion, but you need to see if your state pays for abortions. Uncle Sam doesn't pay.
I do not buy your tap dancing on this subject. I do not believe there's a difference or distinction.
When I use the word Govt, I am very often lumping State and Federal together as they both exist off of tax dollars.
My state pays for all forms of welfare. As does yours. Illegals welcome, too
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 16, 2022 3:50:16 GMT
It doesn't get FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS. So my tax dollars might cover someone's abortion, but you need to see if your state pays for abortions. Uncle Sam doesn't pay.
I do not buy your tap dancing on this subject. I do not believe there's a difference or distinction.
When I use the word Govt, I am very often lumping State and Federal together as they both exist off of tax dollars.
My state pays for all forms of welfare. As does yours. Illegals welcome, too
firstcareclinic.org/will-wisconsin-medicaid-pay-for-abortion/So not completely Dude, what my state uses tax dollars for doesn't matter to you. My state sends more to DC than we get back. We're subsidizing red states.
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Sept 16, 2022 8:23:34 GMT
I do not buy your tap dancing on this subject. I do not believe there's a difference or distinction.
When I use the word Govt, I am very often lumping State and Federal together as they both exist off of tax dollars.
My state pays for all forms of welfare. As does yours. Illegals welcome, too
firstcareclinic.org/will-wisconsin-medicaid-pay-for-abortion/So not completely Dude, what my state uses tax dollars for doesn't matter to you. My state sends more to DC than we get back. We're subsidizing red states.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 16, 2022 12:16:59 GMT
That doesn't surprise me in the least..........as I said, we're a welfare/sanctuary state, too
I can still have an opinion on what your state does, just as you can have one on mine.
And I think that's shameful. California should STOP supporting Red States.......and all states should start limiting what they're sending into the Feds, imo
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 17, 2022 7:21:21 GMT
That doesn't surprise me in the least..........as I said, we're a welfare/sanctuary state, too
I can still have an opinion on what your state does, just as you can have one on mine.
And I think that's shameful. California should STOP supporting Red States.......and all states should start limiting what they're sending into the Feds, imo
Federal tax, dude. So by keeping taxes low in their states, the red states suck up fed money.
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Sept 17, 2022 12:04:16 GMT
That doesn't surprise me in the least..........as I said, we're a welfare/sanctuary state, too
I can still have an opinion on what your state does, just as you can have one on mine.
And I think that's shameful. California should STOP supporting Red States.......and all states should start limiting what they're sending into the Feds, imo
Federal tax, dude. So by keeping taxes low in their states, the red states suck up fed money. Doesn't that seem like a stat picking situation to you? Like they're counting it as a percentage of the state's budget provided for with Federal funds........as opposed to $Total Amount?
But even if that's the case, I've heard several states have been mooches for decades, Georgia, Alabama, etc etc .....and I'm against it ALL. They've been mooching too long.
And don't forget, it was only recently revealed by Trump that the people living in 'high tax' Blue states actually get to deduct their state taxes off of their federal taxes. Talk about a workaround.
|
|
|
Post by merh on Sept 17, 2022 13:29:48 GMT
Federal tax, dude. So by keeping taxes low in their states, the red states suck up fed money. Doesn't that seem like a stat picking situation to you? Like they're counting it as a percentage of the state's budget provided for with Federal funds........as opposed to $Total Amount?
But even if that's the case, I've heard several states have been mooches for decades, Georgia, Alabama, etc etc .....and I'm against it ALL. They've been mooching too long.
And don't forget, it was only recently revealed by Trump that the people living in 'high tax' Blue states actually get to deduct their state taxes off of their federal taxes. Talk about a workaround.
I knew about it because I did my taxes, not that I ever deducted my state tax. You have to have a certain level of deduction to be able to do it. Sort of like deducting your home
|
|