|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 8, 2021 9:02:56 GMT
Incarcerate the students......... how else to keep them all safe?
A Texas woman was arrested after posing as her 13-year-old daughter for a day of a middle school
Rachel Askinasi Sun, June 6, 2021, 2:50 PM
Casey Garcia, 30, posed as her 13-year-old daughter for what she described as a social experiment.
She said in videos that she sneaked into her daughter's school to prove a point about lax security.
Garcia said she made it through nearly an entire day of school before getting caught.
Casey Garcia was arrested on Friday in El Paso, Texas, after she posed as her 13-year-old daughter for almost an entire day of school.
Garcia, 30, was arrested on suspicion of criminal trespassing and tampering with government records, according to KFOX, a local Fox affiliate.
Garcia had documented her experience in the school, in the San Elizario Independent School District, and posted the video on YouTube.
Garcia could be seen in the video wearing a yellow Marvel hoodie, a black disposable face mask, jeans, a backpack, and high-top sneakers.
"Do I look like a seventh-grader?" she asked. "No? Cool. Awesome."
Garcia said no one noticed she wasn't her daughter until the seventh class period, at the end of the school day.
"I've been here all day, face-to-face with teachers," she said in the video as she ate lunch.
Garcia posted a follow-up video saying her motivation for posing as her daughter to spend a day at school was to explore school safety.
"I was nervous the entire time," she said.
Garcia said she'd come into contact with the principal, several faculty members, and security guards at the front of the school when she entered at the beginning of the day. She said that no one, including almost all the teachers in the classes she attended, realized she wasn't her daughter.
She said that before she got caught at the end of the day, the only trouble she'd gotten into was for having her phone out.
"The school was so concerned that my phone was out that they weren't even paying attention to who I was," she said.
Garcia said her intention was to keep the name of the school out of her story.
"This is about our children and the safety of our children," she said. "That's all I'm trying to do is prevent another mass shooting."
Garcia did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.
As of May 28, there had been at least 225 mass shootings in the US in 2021. In March, experts told Insider that school shootings were likely to increase as more students got back into classrooms after a period of remote learning. But they said that threat-assessment trainings and stricter gun laws could help prevent the shootings.
A third video showed Garcia's encounter with the police on Friday. Officers could be heard telling her she was being arrested in connection with a traffic warrant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 8, 2021 16:54:25 GMT
Good on her!
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 9, 2021 0:59:32 GMT
Like one of those people that keep sneaking onto airlines
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 9, 2021 3:20:34 GMT
Like one of those people that keep sneaking onto airlines
 ? |
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 9, 2021 5:26:15 GMT
Like one of those people that keep sneaking onto airlines
?
I'm not sure whether to question what they think they're proving exactly? or cheer them on for showing the reality of humans and their activities?
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 9, 2021 11:14:54 GMT
?
I'm not sure whether to question what they think they're proving exactly? or cheer them on for showing the reality of humans and their activities?
Because one person did it there must be... how many others doing it?
Grandma there should be a coyote. She could make a mint.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 9, 2021 11:39:04 GMT
I'm not sure whether to question what they think they're proving exactly? or cheer them on for showing the reality of humans and their activities?
Because one person did it there must be... how many others doing it?
Grandma there should be a coyote. She could make a mint.
She's not the only one....... just the most prolific one in recent news.
Do you actually believe that woman's actions will make her school safer? Would you really prefer all US schools become like airports with metal detectors and a ton of staff with rubber gloves?
There's a ton of coyotes making really good money now.......Kamala & Co pretty much endorsed that. YAY! For all the sex traffickers, too Hollywood will be relieved to get back to business again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 9, 2021 11:44:01 GMT
Because one person did it there must be... how many others doing it?
Grandma there should be a coyote. She could make a mint.
She's not the only one....... just the most prolific one in recent news.
Do you actually believe that woman's actions will make her school safer? Would you really prefer all US schools become like airports with metal detectors and a ton of staff with rubber gloves?
There's a ton of coyotes making really good money now.......Kamala & Co pretty much endorsed that. YAY! For all the sex traffickers, too Hollywood will be relieved to get back to business again.
Typical racist Trumpanzee:
A "lib" says "don't bother coming. You can't get in."
and you heard:
"Please feel free to illegally violate our borders."
SMFH
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 9, 2021 11:50:22 GMT
Typical racist Trumpanzee:
A "lib" says "don't bother coming. You can't get in."
and you heard:
"Please feel free to illegally violate our borders."
SMFH
Typical lib.........votes for someone that said "Trump is a racist xenophobe for telling people to not come to the US and doesn't want to let them in." "Kids in CAGES?!"......but once their people do the same things, it's a kinder gentler and more caring approach.
Joe and her both said 'Come to the US' during the campaigning........and now that it's become a crisis that the media refuses to call a crisis? "Don't come." And you won't even acknowledge the flip-flop
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 9, 2021 12:00:31 GMT
Typical racist Trumpanzee:
A "lib" says "don't bother coming. You can't get in."
and you heard:
"Please feel free to illegally violate our borders."
SMFH
Typical lib.........votes for someone that said "Trump is a racist xenophobe for telling people to not come to the US and doesn't want to let them in." "Kids in CAGES?!"......but once their people do the same things, it's a kinder gentler and more caring approach.
Joe and her both said 'Come to the US' during the campaigning........and now that it's become a crisis that the media refuses to call a crisis? "Don't come." And you won't even acknowledge the flip-flop
I didn't vote for Joe and Kammie
I NEVER vote Big 2.
And I didn't listen to any of their promises because they are politicians.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 9, 2021 12:03:17 GMT
I didn't vote for Joe and Kammie
I NEVER vote Big 2.
And I didn't listen to any of their promises because they are politicians.
I forgot that about you.........but like me leaning conservative, you certainly lean liberal when it comes to politicians, so forgive me for forgetting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 9, 2021 12:12:39 GMT
I didn't vote for Joe and Kammie
I NEVER vote Big 2.
And I didn't listen to any of their promises because they are politicians.
I forgot that about you.........but like me leaning conservative, you certainly lean liberal when it comes to politicians, so forgive me for forgetting.
I lean libertarian... as opposed to you |
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 9, 2021 12:40:05 GMT
I forgot that about you.........but like me leaning conservative, you certainly lean liberal when it comes to politicians, so forgive me for forgetting.
I lean libertarian... as opposed to you
oh, YAH! You're ALL about self-determination and personal freedoms.
Can you show me in the libertarian platform where it promotes collectivism and adopting all your neighbors?
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 9, 2021 12:47:21 GMT
Libertarian Party Platform
Fiscal policy: The Libertarian party opposes taxation in pretty much all forms, and it deals with the revenue loss by opposing entitlement programs across the board. This means that people keep more of what they earn, but it also means that there is no social safety net. Ambitious, sweeping proposals — such as universal pre-kindergarten and universal health care — are obviously not compatible with this objective.
Corporations: The party would eliminate all federal subsidies to private corporations, as well as all antitrust laws.
Public services: The Libertarian party would like to eliminate the U.S. Postal Service. It wants to transfer all government services, from public schools to landfills, to private ownership.
Property rights: The party would restrict the public domain to immediate public use and sell or give away most public property to private owners.
Criminal justice: It would eliminate all anti-drug laws and legalize prostitution, as well as end random police roadblocks.
Free speech: The party would abolish the FCC and allow private ownership of broadcast frequencies. It opposes all restriction of free speech, including that in the name of national security.
Church and state: The Libertarian party calls for reduced IRS regulation and monitoring of tax-exempt churches.
The Second Amendment: The party strongly opposes all gun control, as well as regulation of alternative weapon technologies, such as mace and tasers.
The draft: It calls for the abolition of the Selective Service System and amnesty for any citizen who has ever resisted the draft.
Reproductive rights: The Libertarian party is pro-choice. It opposes all federal funding of abortion and most federal entitlements for women who choose to carry their pregnancies to term, including the child tax credit. it opposes involuntary or fraudulent sterilization.
LGBT rights: The party opposes the "don't ask, don't tell" doctrine. It believes that marriage is a private contract, and as such, it should yield no government benefits regardless of the gender of the partners.
Immigrants' rights: The Libertarian party argues that borders should be open but surveilled. Everyone who does not pose a threat to public health or national security should be allowed to enter the country legally. It would deny all federal benefits to undocumented immigrants.
================================================================================
So aside from the 'no borders' thinking........ I'm OK with all of that. You?
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 10, 2021 1:35:46 GMT
I lean libertarian... as opposed to you
oh, YAH! You're ALL about self-determination and personal freedoms.
Can you show me in the libertarian platform where it promotes collectivism and adopting all your neighbors?
I never advocated "collectivism" - at least not in the pejorative sense that you use it - and I never advocated adopting my neighbors. I did suggest being nice to them... helpful as a means of helping you realize the interconnectedness of communities and society as a whole.
As for a platform... I believe I typed an "l" not an "L."
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 10, 2021 1:52:54 GMT
oh, YAH! You're ALL about self-determination and personal freedoms.
Can you show me in the libertarian platform where it promotes collectivism and adopting all your neighbors?
I never advocated "collectivism" - at least not in the pejorative sense that you use it - and I never advocated adopting my neighbors. I did suggest being nice to them... helpful as a means of helping you realize the interconnectedness of communities and society as a whole.
As for a platform... I believe I typed an "l" not an "L."
\ you did also claim to be more libertarian leaning than I........ so can you lemme know how you came to that conclusion?
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 10, 2021 2:02:59 GMT
I never advocated "collectivism" - at least not in the pejorative sense that you use it - and I never advocated adopting my neighbors. I did suggest being nice to them... helpful as a means of helping you realize the interconnectedness of communities and society as a whole.
As for a platform... I believe I typed an "l" not an "L."
\ you did also claim to be more libertarian leaning than I........ so can you lemme know how you came to that conclusion?
Because I want everyone to be able to exercise their liberty. You seem more focused on forcing people to accept what they have and be thankful that they have that little.
You say that you want fewer laws and regulations but you seem very focused on making sure that certain people be subjected to obviously petty and unnecessary laws.
I could go on, but I'm pretty certain that you won't see what I'm saying anyway, but in short, you seem to want people to accept the life of a drone (unless YOU deem them worthy). THAT is collectivism.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 10, 2021 2:22:57 GMT
Because I want everyone to be able to exercise their liberty. You seem more focused on forcing people to accept what they have and be thankful that they have that little.
You say that you want fewer laws and regulations but you seem very focused on making sure that certain people be subjected to obviously petty and unnecessary laws.
I could go on, but I'm pretty certain that you won't see what I'm saying anyway, but in short, you seem to want people to accept the life of a drone (unless YOU deem them worthy). THAT is collectivism.
I'm all for everyone working and earning as much as they can......... you seem to want those kinda people taxed and forced to give to everyone else.
I'm all for fewer laws and regulations. Until your kinda politicians start removing laws, isn't that still the law? You're blaming me and the police for enforcing law?
I'm all for voluntary participation. Most people are and will end up being very drone-like.......... because that is the natural state of things. I wasn't in charge of evolution. Blame someone else for reality.
Whether I deem someone worthy or not has nothing to do with how far they can go or how high they can achieve. Now stop expecting me to foot the bill to support them until they do something (and even when they don't)
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 10, 2021 2:47:47 GMT
Because I want everyone to be able to exercise their liberty. You seem more focused on forcing people to accept what they have and be thankful that they have that little.
You say that you want fewer laws and regulations but you seem very focused on making sure that certain people be subjected to obviously petty and unnecessary laws.
I could go on, but I'm pretty certain that you won't see what I'm saying anyway, but in short, you seem to want people to accept the life of a drone (unless YOU deem them worthy). THAT is collectivism.
I'm all for everyone working and earning as much as they can......... you seem to want those kinda people taxed and forced to give to everyone else.
I'm all for fewer laws and regulations. Until your kinda politicians start removing laws, isn't that still the law? You're blaming me and the police for enforcing law?
I'm all for voluntary participation. Most people are and will end up being very drone-like.......... because that is the natural state of things. I wasn't in charge of evolution. Blame someone else for reality.
Whether I deem someone worthy or not has nothing to do with how far they can go or how high they can achieve. Now stop expecting me to foot the bill to support them until they do something (and even when they don't)
1. Absolutely not. I want EVERYBODY to be able to access the necessities required for a healthy and potentially prosperous life. Those programs need to be funded and that means taxes... from EVERYBODY except the poorest.
I know that you think that the poorest will just continue to suck up the freebies and never contribute and I agree that some will continue to live off the government teat. The difference is that I think that that number will get lower in the long term and I realize that those people ARE contributing to the economy, just not at the same level as others. You want to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
2. Yes, Abs. I want there to be fewer laws. But I want the remaining ones to apply equally to all citizens. I don't blame the police for enforcing the laws. I blame them for enforcing them unequally. I blame the entire justice system for that.
3. Just because many will end up as drones doesn't mean we should FORCE it upon them. If you want to be able to honestly say, "They have no one to blame but themselves," then you have to remove anything which could be construed as a barrier.
4. I expect you to do your duty and meet your responsibilities as an American citizen and as a member of the human race. Evolution requires it.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 10, 2021 13:10:10 GMT
1. Absolutely not. I want EVERYBODY to be able to access the necessities required for a healthy and potentially prosperous life. Those programs need to be funded and that means taxes... from EVERYBODY except the poorest.
I know that you think that the poorest will just continue to suck up the freebies and never contribute and I agree that some will continue to live off the government teat. The difference is that I think that that number will get lower in the long term and I realize that those people ARE contributing to the economy, just not at the same level as others. You want to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
2. Yes, Abs. I want there to be fewer laws. But I want the remaining ones to apply equally to all citizens. I don't blame the police for enforcing the laws. I blame them for enforcing them unequally. I blame the entire justice system for that.
3. Just because many will end up as drones doesn't mean we should FORCE it upon them. If you want to be able to honestly say, "They have no one to blame but themselves," then you have to remove anything which could be construed as a barrier.
4. I expect you to do your duty and meet your responsibilities as an American citizen and as a member of the human race. Evolution requires it.
1. so a bit of bread and water.......and schooling up to the 5th-10 Grade, perhaps? There should also be a cap on those taxes, I say in the 20% range.
Why do you think that?......when it's never happened?.....and it's clearly getting worse? How about a compromise and we agree that the $amount of welfare never surpass 1/2 of what a person can make working minimum wages at McDs or someplace?
2. So do I. From poor to rich, white to black, male to female (and whatever) all laws should apply to everyone equally. If the Govt can't handle that small task, why trust them with anything else? The police don't necessarily enforce the laws........that's the prosecution, no? If the DA never pressed charges on certain crimes or for certain people.......you don't think the cops would stop bothering to arrest them? They certainly did with most Illegals in this country the last few decades.
3. Where's the force, though? You don't pay attention in school and get good grades........you don't learn the valuable lessons growing up........ you don't take advantage of all the stuff the country has to offer early on........WHO forced you to be stuck with no skills and no education? Oh, c'mon...... every once in awhile even you acknowledge that the excuse making for some of this stuff is ridiculous. We have entire education system involved in excuse making now.......and parties, too. The many success stories are always the exception to the rule?
4. I don't harm anyone directly......... I work to support my household.........and I pay my taxes.......that's about all I think you can expect from me as a human. Anything else should be a choice and considered extra, on my part.
"Mystical references to 'society' and its programs to 'help' may warm the hearts of the gullible but what it really means is putting more power in the hands of bureaucrats." -Thomas Sowell
|
|
?![[cheers]](http://storage.proboards.com/7182076/images/engyBVslEdpmpmdnBwZQ.gif)
