|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 3, 2022 6:04:19 GMT
the countless investigations and recounts have shown that there was NO wide-scale voter fraud. Stringing together some poor quality video clips isn't going to change that. BOB CHRISTIE Thu, June 2, 2022, 1:54 PM PHOENIX (AP) — An Arizona woman accused of illegally collecting early ballots in the 2020 primary election pleaded guilty Thursday in an agreement with state prosecutors that saw the more serious forgery and conspiracy charges dismissed and limited any potential for a lengthy prison sentence. Guillermina Fuentes, 66, could get probation for running what Arizona attorney general's office investigators said was a sophisticated operation using her status as a well-known Democratic operative in the border city of San Luis to persuade voters to let her gather and in some cases fill out their ballots. Prosecutors were apparently unable to prove the most serious charges, dropping three felony counts alleging that Fuentes filled out one voter's ballot and forged signatures on some of the four ballots she illegally returned for people who were not family members. Republicans who have rallied around the possibility of widespread voting fraud in the 2020 election where former President Donald Trump was defeated have pointed to the charges against Fuentes as part of a broader pattern in battleground states. But there’s no sign her illegal ballot collection went beyond the small-town politics Fuentes was involved in. =========================================================
One small fish in a very large ocean...........an ocean that the Establishment chooses NOT to pursue certain types to catch.
Collecting ballots is not fraud and it wasn't illegal the previous election.
Sounds more like she got caught doing what she thought was legal without knowing that the GOP had been working overtime to invalidate all early and mail in votes even before the election.
Also, she wasn't convicted of fraud from what I can read here.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 3, 2022 11:39:14 GMT
You can tell how closely I watched that one. I'd rather rewatch the Eiger Sanction a few more times
I'd be happy to watch both again.
I like that one for the argument over a secret formula that our Govt isn't even supposed to have, but the enemy stole.  |
|
|
|
Post by abbey1227 on Jun 3, 2022 11:40:37 GMT
Collecting ballots is not fraud and it wasn't illegal the previous election.
Sounds more like she got caught doing what she thought was legal without knowing that the GOP had been working overtime to invalidate all early and mail in votes even before the election.
Also, she wasn't convicted of fraud from what I can read here.
of course not.........as a faithful democrat she was given the lightest sentence possible. I'm surprised she didn't have an intersection named after her
|
|
|
|
Post by ant-mac on Jun 3, 2022 18:17:32 GMT
I'd be happy to watch both again.
I like that one for the argument over a secret formula that our Govt isn't even supposed to have, but the enemy stole.  Yeah, that plot would work well on any level... major film or minor TV series. For a large government or a private citizen. |
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Jun 3, 2022 22:52:34 GMT
Collecting ballots is not fraud and it wasn't illegal the previous election.
Sounds more like she got caught doing what she thought was legal without knowing that the GOP had been working overtime to invalidate all early and mail in votes even before the election.
Also, she wasn't convicted of fraud from what I can read here.
of course not.........as a faithful democrat she was given the lightest sentence possible. I'm surprised she didn't have an intersection named after her
I'm going to go with "she didn't get convicted of a crime she DIDN'T commit." |
|
![[cheers]](http://storage.proboards.com/7182076/images/engyBVslEdpmpmdnBwZQ.gif)
